Is it correct and safe to assume that "use by" dates are less precise the longer in future they are? [duplicate]
![Is it correct and safe to assume that "use by" dates are less precise the longer in future they are? [duplicate] - Optical equipment for testing vision](/assets/images/is_it_correct_and_safe_to_assume_that_quotuse_byquot_dates_are_less_precise_the_longer_in_future_they_are_duplicate_0.jpeg "Is it correct and safe to assume that \"use by\" dates are less precise the longer in future they are? [duplicate] - Optical equipment for testing vision")
When there is some food (like cheese or ham) that has roughly a week "use by" date, I assume that it's safe to eat it a day after it's "use by" date.
For other food that has approx. half year "use by" date (like olives in glass or pesto) I think it's safe to eat it for anything up to a month or so.
And for canned foods having years it should be safe to eat few months after "use by" date.
My thinking is that it's harder to pinpoint the exact date the further the date is in the future. I would even expect that "use by" dates are something around the half time the food is still actually edible.
Am I correct in this line of thinking? Do you know of any reliable resources on this? I couldn't find anything.
Best Answer
"Use by" dates are pretty imprecise to start with. They're designed to be conservative, and they have a huge amount of leeway.
To the degree that they mean anything at all, I'd say that their precision is proportional to their duration. They might be conservative by, say, a factor of 2: eggs that are good for "1 week" are likely to be good for at least 2, and a box of cake mix good for "6 months" will be good for at least a year. And so on.
The fudge factor may well be closer to 4, or even 10. I've certainly kept a lot of things much, much longer than the expected dates. The only things for which expiration dates even come close is meat and fish, followed by milk. Those are things that "go bad" in obvious and unpleasant ways. Everything else just kinda gradually degrades, rather than suddenly becoming toxic.
Pictures about "Is it correct and safe to assume that "use by" dates are less precise the longer in future they are? [duplicate]"
![Is it correct and safe to assume that "use by" dates are less precise the longer in future they are? [duplicate] - Serious woman wearing new eyeglasses](/assets/images/is_it_correct_and_safe_to_assume_that_quotuse_byquot_dates_are_less_precise_the_longer_in_future_they_are_duplicate_1.jpeg "Is it correct and safe to assume that \"use by\" dates are less precise the longer in future they are? [duplicate] - Serious woman wearing new eyeglasses")
![Is it correct and safe to assume that "use by" dates are less precise the longer in future they are? [duplicate] - Anonymous female doctor covering eye of female client while choosing proper lenses during appointment in optical salon on blurred background](/assets/images/is_it_correct_and_safe_to_assume_that_quotuse_byquot_dates_are_less_precise_the_longer_in_future_they_are_duplicate_2.jpeg "Is it correct and safe to assume that \"use by\" dates are less precise the longer in future they are? [duplicate] - Anonymous female doctor covering eye of female client while choosing proper lenses during appointment in optical salon on blurred background")
![Is it correct and safe to assume that "use by" dates are less precise the longer in future they are? [duplicate] - From above blackboard in wooden frame with white text on center under medical mask against black background](/assets/images/is_it_correct_and_safe_to_assume_that_quotuse_byquot_dates_are_less_precise_the_longer_in_future_they_are_duplicate_3.jpeg "Is it correct and safe to assume that \"use by\" dates are less precise the longer in future they are? [duplicate] - From above blackboard in wooden frame with white text on center under medical mask against black background")
Python Pandas Tutorial (Part 8): Grouping and Aggregating - Analyzing and Exploring Your Data
Sources: Stack Exchange - This article follows the attribution requirements of Stack Exchange and is licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0.
Images: Ksenia Chernaya, Ksenia Chernaya, Ksenia Chernaya, Brett Sayles